🔗 Share this article

British American Tobacco has been accused of “complete double standards” for campaigning against anti-smoking regulations in Africa that currently exist in the UK.

Campaign in Zambia

Correspondence acquired by reporters sent from the firm's affiliate in Zambia to the African officials asks for measures restricting tobacco advertising and sponsorship to be abandoned or delayed.

The tobacco firm seeks amendments to a draft bill that include reductions in the suggested dimensions of pictorial cautions on cigarette packaging, the elimination of limitations on flavored smoking items, and diminished punishments for any businesses disregarding the new laws.

Activist commentary

“Were I in government, I would say that they enable the defense of the British people and sustain the fatalities of the Zambian people,” stated the anti-tobacco campaigner.

Over seven thousand citizens a year pass away from cigarette-linked health conditions, according to global health agency statistics.

Chimbala said the letter was known to have been circulated to various ministerial offices and was in distribution within community advocacy networks.

Global industry interference concerns

The situation emerges alongside broader worries about business sector influence with health policies. In recent weeks, WHO officials raised concerns that the tobacco industry was intensifying efforts to dilute worldwide restrictions.

“Evidence exists of industry lobbying worldwide. Tobacco company fingerprints are on deferred levy rises in Indonesia, delayed regulations in Zambia and even a diluted statement at the UN summit conference,” stated the tobacco industry watchdog.

Possible outcomes

“When public health regulation isn’t passed because of this letter, the price could be paid in lives of people who might potentially stop smoking.”

The tobacco control bill being considered by Zambia’s parliament includes regulations surpassing UK legislation by also applying to e-cigarettes, and mandating that graphic health warnings cover 75% of product packaging.

Corporate counter-proposals

Via documentation, the corporation proposes this be decreased to less than half “according to global guideline limits”, delayed for at least twelve months after the legislation is approved.

Global health authorities in fact recommends a caution must occupy at least fifty percent of the cigarette package face “and aim to cover as much of the main visible surfaces as possible”. In the UK, warnings are required to occupy nearly two-thirds of a cigarette pack surfaces.

Scented product controversy

The corporation requests the removal of broad restrictions on flavored cigarette varieties, arguing that it would push consumers toward “black market” products. The corporation recommends prohibiting a smaller list of “flavours based on desserts, candy, energy drinks, soft drinks and alcohol drinks”. Each flavored smoking item have been outlawed across the UK since 2020.

The proposed legislation suggests penalties for different infractions “ranging from a fraction of annual sales to 10 years’ imprisonment”.

Business explanation

Through correspondence, the company executive of British American Tobacco Zambia states the corporation is focused on responsible corporate conduct” and “backs the goals of governments to decrease cigarette consumption and the connected wellbeing effects” but claims that “certain measures can have undesirable and unforeseen outcomes.”

Critic response

The campaigner argued the company's suggested modifications would “dilute these regulations so much that the impact needed for it to produce permanent improvement in society will not be achieved”.

The fact that numerous similar measures were present in the UK, where the company maintains its main office, was “utter hypocrisy itself”, he said.

“We exist in a international community. Should I grow cigarettes in my garden and harvest that and market the products – and my children do not consume tobacco, but my neighbour’s children do … to profit individually and all the subsequent offspring while my community's youth are perishing … is in itself complete moral failure.”

Anti-smoking regulations in the UK or elsewhere had failed to shutter businesses, the campaigner stated. “Legislation never shuts down the industry. They merely safeguard the people.”

Formal company response

The company representative said: “The company operates its business in compliance with current country statutes. Additionally, the corporation engages in the country’s legislative process in line with the suitable systems which provide for relevant group engagement in legislation creation.”

The corporation remained “not against rules”, they said, mentioning that underage people should be safeguarded against access to tobacco and nicotine.

“We champion evolving legislation to achieve intended public health goals, while acknowledging the spectrum of entitlements and duties on businesses, users and involved parties,” the spokesperson stated, mentioning that BAT’s proposals “reflect the realities of the African nation's economy and tobacco industry, which includes growing volumes of illegal commerce”.

Zambia’s department of trade, commerce and industry was contacted for response.